Build or Buy: Should Your Fintech Develop Its Core Banking System In-House?

Build or Buy: Should Your Fintech Develop Its Core Banking System In-House?

As a fintech, one of the biggest strategic decisions you’ll face is whether to build your own Core Banking System (CBS) or opt for a third-party solution. This decision has long-term implications for control, scalability, and compliance. In this article, we’ll explore the pros and cons of both approaches to help you make an informed decision.

The Core Banking Market: A Growing but Consolidating Space

The global CBS market is booming, expected to reach $62 billion by 2032 with an annual growth rate of 17%. This trend is driven by traditional banks looking to launch fast, standalone digital brands — like Raiffeisen Bank International AG, which launched a digital bank in Poland, independent from its legacy systems.

In France, the culture still leans towards in-house development. Players like Spendesk or Blank only outsource the payment component (via Numeral), while Lydia and Qonto have chosen to build everything internally.

Building Your CBS In-House

✅ Advantages

  • Total control: Full customization according to your product and regulatory needs, with internal teams fully aligned to your strategy.
  • Vendor independence: No reliance on external roadmaps or feature delivery timelines.
  • Tech agnosticism: Freedom to choose partners (e.g., card issuers, partner banks) independently.

❌ Drawbacks

  • High upfront costs: Building a dedicated team or legal entity can cost between €2M and €15M in the first year.
  • Slow time-to-market: Expect 12–18 months minimum, including team recruitment and training.
  • Regulatory upkeep: Staying updated with AML controls, regulatory reporting, and Rulebooks can heavily affect your roadmap.
  • Innovation bottlenecks: Internal capacity can limit your speed to market and product differentiation.

Buying a CBS: Plug-and-Play Core Infrastructure

✅ Advantages

  • Faster deployment: Go live in as little as 3–6 months.
  • Predictable costs: SaaS models offer pricing per transaction (€0.001–€0.01) and per account.
  • Automatic updates: Get access to new market features without internal R&D spending.

❌ Drawbacks

  • Vendor lock-in: Custom needs are subject to vendor priorities — for instance, some banks were delayed in rolling out instant payments for this reason.
  • Scaling costs: Recurring fees can grow with usage, especially for features like account management or regulatory reporting.

What About Hybrid Approaches?

Some fintechs are adopting a hybrid model — combining in-house CBS with external services like Numeral for payments. Others choose composable banking platforms like Mambu, offering deep customization while outsourcing components like the ledger or credit modules.

Related Searches

  • Core Banking System build vs buy
  • Best CBS solutions for fintechs
  • Mambu vs in-house CBS
  • How long to develop a banking core system?

FAQ: Building or Buying Your CBS

Is it worth building your own CBS?
Only if your product roadmap requires high customization and you have the capital and talent to support long-term development.
Can I start with a vendor and build later?
Yes, many fintechs launch with SaaS CBS providers and migrate internally as they scale.
Is CBS development really that expensive?
Yes — developing a CBS in-house involves engineering, compliance, security, and DevOps costs that often exceed €10M in year one.

Citations

Source: Grandview Research – Core Banking Market Forecast

Source: Numeral.io – Payment Infrastructure for Fintechs

Comments are closed.